Search results

Medicaid, Medicare, and managed care reimbursement changes since the early 1980s have put added financial pressure on hospitals, increasing fears that private hospitals will decrease support for indigent care and that those hospitals that serve a disproportionately large indigent population may be forced to close. Wilson and Kizer (1997) use the term “safety net” to convey the notion that public health facilities, such as Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VA), municipal hospitals, community health centers, and local public health departments, are providing uncompensated care for an increasing number of uninsured due to increasing cost pressures on private health facilities. Other research efforts also give evidence of increasing patient demand pressures on public health facilities in recent years (Lipson & Naierman, 1996). However, these efforts are often cross-sectional in design or limited to information from only one or a few health facilities in a metropolitan area (Baxter & Mechanic, 1997). As such, it is very difficult to measure fully the extent to which new legislation and private market changes have an effect on the public health “safety net” over time.This research considers the longitudinal relationship between the effect of Illinois implementation of the ICARE Medicaid reimbursement program, private hospital closings and the demand for VA inpatient services in a large metropolitan market in Chicago in the 1980s. Analysis is conducted with a combination of VA hospital discharge data, zip code level sociodemographic data from the U.S. Census, and data on hospital closures in the Chicago area between 1980 and 1990. The combined data allow for a longitudinal analysis of the tradeoffs between new state policy and hospitals over the provision of care for the indigent, including the effects of changes in reimbursement for Medicaid patients.

Globalization of health care services is becoming an alternative or complementary strategy for some U.S. health care organizations due to increased competition, a stagnant health care market, and nationally imposed cost constraints in the U.S. Additionally, entrepreneurial U.S. firms may see globalization as an opportunity to promote their services in new countries with increasing demand for advanced technological services. If an ambitious American health care firm decides to globalize its product or service lines, what might be some of the primary strategies it would use to enter an international market? To investigate this question, this chapter considers the strategies of two American firms that have entered the Beijing and Shanghai markets since 2000. We conducted numerous telephone conversations and interviews with executives of these firms in an attempt to understand their market entry and early development strategies. These firms’ market entry strategies range from “greenfield” operations, where the hospital does little to change its corporate and managerial style from what it uses domestically, to a “glocalization” strategy, where the firm is quite sensitive to fitting into the Chinese culture and being accepted by the Chinese government. The strategic challenges for international hospital organization developments in China are many, but the potential rewards from becoming among the leading firms in a large nation with an expanding economy are tremendous. What we learn from the experiences of enterprising American hospital firms in Chinese may well portend the future for international developments by many other American-based health organizations.

We hope this research volume will change the way scholars and managers think about health care management in two fundamental ways. First, we want to challenge the superficial separations between national and international health care management. To dissolve these distinctions, the “not-invented-here” or “who cares about a Belgian, Indian, or Thai medical center,” or “that won’t work in our policy system” attitudes must change. Second, we want scholars and managers to learn how to transfer innovative ideas and management practices across cultures and around policy barriers. Cultural, language, and policy differences present formidable barriers, but we believe lessons about managing human resources, informatics, quality, services, and strategies in health care organizations can be transferred.

This study contributes to the understanding of the health effects of pesticides exposure and of how pesticides have been and should be regulated.

This study presents literature reviews for the period 2000–2013 on (i) the health effects of pesticides and on (ii) preference valuation of health risks related to pesticides, as well as a discussion of the role of benefit-cost analysis applied to pesticide regulatory measures.

This study indicates that the health literature has focused on individuals with direct exposure to pesticides, i.e. farmers, while the literature on preference valuation has focused on those with indirect exposure, i.e. consumers. The discussion highlights the need to clarify the rationale for regulating pesticides, the role of risk perceptions in benefit-cost analysis, and the importance of inter-disciplinary research in this area.

This study relates findings of different disciplines (health, economics, public policy) regarding pesticides, and identifies gaps for future research.

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) affects both civilian and military populations following wartime experiences. However, despite an abundance of research investigating civilian and military populations separately, much less focus has been given to synthesizing and integrating findings to describe how civilian and military war survivors are comparatively affected by PTSD. This review is broken down into three sections covering (1) risk factors associated with PTSD, (2) relationships between PTSD and mental health outcomes, and (3) protective factors that can attenuate PTSD and its effects. Each section covers findings for civilians and military personnel and highlights similarities and differences between groups.